SCI 投稿信件模板 所有的 共10頁

helloshigy

SCI_投稿全過程信件模板.pdf (235.81 KB, 下載次數(shù): 0, 售價(jià): 3 金幣)

2013-1-29 15:00 上傳

點(diǎn)擊文件名下載附件
售價(jià): 3 金幣  [記錄]  [購買]

一、最初投稿

Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit theenclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered forpublication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submissionof this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described wasoriginal research that has not been published previously, and not underconsideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authorslisted have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated…… (簡要介紹一下論文的創(chuàng)新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “JournalName”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1)Name A   E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B   E-mail: ××××@××××Wedeeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward toreceiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please don’thesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yourssincerely,××××××Corresponding author: Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××

二、催稿信

Dear Prof. ×××:

Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is theright time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscripttitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿號), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than twomonths, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering thatmy manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciatedif you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleasedto hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for yourconsideration.

Best regards!

Yours sincerely,××××××

Corresponding author: Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××

三、修改稿

Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（寫上負(fù)責(zé)你文章編輯的姓名，顯得尊重，因?yàn)榈谝淮蔚耐陡宀恢�道具體負(fù)責(zé)的編輯，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us anopportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers verymuch for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on ourmanuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿號).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully andhave made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best torevise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find therevised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.Wewould like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for commentson our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and bestregards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答審稿人的意見（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thankyou for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscriptentitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿號). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improvingour paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. Wehave studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meetwith approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The maincorrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are asflowing:Responds to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response tocomment: (……簡要列出意見……)Response:××××××2. Response to comment: (……簡要列出意見……)Response: ××××××。。。。。。逐條意見回答，切忌一定不能有遺漏針對不同的問題有下列幾個(gè)禮貌術(shù)語可適當(dāng)用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...We arevery sorry for our incorrect writing ……...It is really true as Reviewersuggested that……We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.Wehave re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestionAs Reviewersuggested that……Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……最后特意感謝一下這個(gè)審稿人的意見：Special thanks to you for your good comments.Reviewer #2: 同上述Reviewer #3:   ××××××Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” werecorrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added 3. Line 129, “……” wasdeleted    ××××××    We tried our best to improve themanuscript and made some changes in the manuscript.  These changeswill not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did notlist the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate forEditors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meetwith approval.Once again, thank you very much for your comments andsuggestions.

五、文章接受后可以考慮感謝一下負(fù)責(zé)你文章的編輯或主編（根據(jù)需要）

Dear Prof. ××××××:Thanks very much for your kind workand consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, wewould like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.Thank youand best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail:××××@××××六、詢問校稿信件（如果文章接受后時(shí)間較長）Dear ×××:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sureif it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of ouraccepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿號), since the copyright agreement for publication hasbeen sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I canreceive the proof of our manuscript from you?I would be greatly appreciated ifyou could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear fromyou.Thank you very much for your consideration.Yourssincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××

七、文章校稿信件

Dear Mr. ×××:Thanks very much for your kind letterabout the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID:文章稿號) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finishedthe proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proofand the answers to the queries are provided below. Corrections:1. In ******should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)2. In **** the “*****” shouldbe “****” (Page ****, Right column, line****)Answers for “author queries”:1.*********************.2. **********************3. **********************Wegreatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of ourpaper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do nothesitate to let us know.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Correspondingauthor:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××

SCI投稿的一些套話

一投稿信

1. Dear Dr. Defendi ML:

I am sending a manuscript entitled “” by – which Ishould like to submit for possible publication in the journal of - .

Yours sincerely

2. Dear Dr. A:

Enclosed is a manuscript entitled “” by sb, which weare submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen thisjournal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest tothe journal’s readers.

3. Dear Dr. A:

Please find enclosed for your review an originalresearch article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version ofthe article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work.No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict ofinterest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached tothis letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 fromanother source.

We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript,and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.

二、詢問有無收到稿件

Dear Editors,

We dispatched our manuscript to your journal on 3August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safearrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you wouldlet us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send ourmanuscript again. Thank you in advance for your help.

三、詢問論文審查回音

Dear Editors，

It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted ourmanuscript (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yetreceived a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I shouldappreciated your letting me know what you have decided as soon as possible.

四、關(guān)于論文的總體審查意見

1. This is a carefully done study and the findings areof considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.

2. This is a well-written paper containing interestingresults which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, anumber of points need clarifying and certain statements require furtherjustification. There are given below.

3. Although these observation are interesting, theyare rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficientlyto warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try submittingtheir findings to specialist journal such as –

4. Although this paper is good, it would be everbetter if some extra data were added.

5. This manuscript is not suitable for publication inthe journal of – because the main observation it describe was reported 3 yearsago in a reputable journal of - .

6. Please ask someone familiar with English languageto help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction atthe beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.

7. We feel that this potentially interesting study hasbeen marred by an inability to communicate the finding correctly in English andshould like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a goodknowledge of English, preferable native speaker.

8. The wording and style of some section, particularlythose concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to thewording of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have beenunderlined.

9. Preliminary experiments only have been done andwith exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This isclearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation betweenassays.

10. The condition of incubation are poorly defined.What is the temperature? Were antibody used?

五、給編輯的回信

1. In reply to the referee’s main criticism of paper,it is possible to say that –

One minor point raised by the referee concerns of theextra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1. This has now beencorrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.

2. I have read the referee’s comments very carefullyand conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it laketoxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my articlealthough perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity ratherthan an error or omission.

3. Thank you for your letter of – and for thereferee’s comments concerning our manuscript entitled “”. We have studied theircomments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with theirapproval.

4. I enclosed a revised manuscript which includes areport of additional experiments done at the referee’s suggestion. You will seethat our original findings are confirmed.

5. We are sending the revised manuscript according tothe comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.

6. We found the referee’s comments most helpful andhave revised the manuscript

7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments ofreviewers in their opening sentence.

8. Thank you for your l